US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, in a virtual meeting with the House Foreign Affairs Committee, called on Israel to take action in the Golan Heights, saying “as long as Syria is a threat to Israel, Israeli control of the Golan Heights must continue.”
Blinken, who sought to interpret Biden’s policy differently from that of his predecessor, Trump, who presented the Golan Heights, Jerusalem, and the West Bank to Netanyahu.
But Blinken uses a logic that exposes above all the true nature of America, bullying and its cowboy law, and ultimately the distinction he wanted to make for Biden in the face of the nature of American bullying, an integral part of culture and character.
When Blinken explicitly states: “Irrespective of the legal status of the Golan Heights, Israel practically controls the region. I think the situation should remain the same unless Syria is no longer a threat to Israel and I think we have not reached this stage yet.” In your opinion, after these statements, can it be said that Blinken’s positions are different from those of his predecessor, Pompeo? Both agree with the occupation of the Syrian Golan by the Zionist regime, and the only difference is the way they express themselves and the type of words they use.
Pompeo acknowledged the Israeli occupation of the Golan Heights, but Blinken took a more diplomatic approach, setting conditions for the Golan Heights to return to Syria.
The “security” that Israel seeks will not be created; because this regime was originally created to destroy the security of the nations in the region. Blinken has expressed hope that one day, with the arrival of US and Israeli mercenaries in power in Damascus, Syria will turn to the United States. But this dream will never come true.