Pak Sahafat – The internal and external threats of the Zionist regime have a close relationship with each other, while the decision-makers of this regime in the field of internal security have lost their ability to determine a practical strategy to deal with these threats due to several reasons.
According to the International group of Pak Sahafat news agency, the Zionist regime has entered the year 2023 and is facing a series of strategic threats. The Institute of Internal Security of the Zionist regime announced in its strategic report for the New Year that Israel is facing threats at the international level, the most important of which is the conflict between the US and China to dominate the international map, as well as the continuation of the war between Ukraine and Russia; Issues that make Israel unable to adhere to the policy of “neutrality” in the international arena.
Observers believe that these threats have greatly reduced the margin of maneuver of the Zionist regime in its foreign policy and diplomatic relations, forcing this regime to make changes in its current foreign policy. Especially, with the progress of Iran’s nuclear program, the Zionists feel more threatened in the region. The strategic evaluations of study centers and Zionist circles show that Iran’s acquisition of nuclear technology means the real collapse of the foundations of Israel’s internal security; Because this regime had guaranteed its security based on the monopoly of nuclear power in the Middle East as a strategic deterrent, but Iran’s nuclear program upsets all these Israeli calculations.
The biggest internal threats of the Zionist regime
Currently, the Zionist regime is suffering from a series of internal problems and threats, which can be generally divided as follows:
– The first challenge is the erosion of the power of the Palestinian Authority, especially in the period after Mahmoud Abbas, its current president, along with the significant increase in Palestinian resistance operations in the West Bank and Jerusalem, which warns of the occurrence of a new intifada. On the other hand, the extreme policies of the new cabinet of the Zionist regime headed by Benjamin Netanyahu, which has put the expansion of settlements and the annexation of the entire West Bank at the top of its agenda, will practically destroy the “two-state” solution in Palestine, which will make the international reactions anti-Zionist.
– The second challenge is the polarization of the Zionist society and the increase of hostile camps within this society after the policies of the new cabinet, especially at the level of the structure of the Israeli judicial system, which has caused the demonstrations of tens of thousands of people against Netanyahu and his allies to become a recurring scene in the streets of Palestine. In this context, many Zionist experts and officials are warning about the occurrence of a civil war between Israelis, in the meantime, the Jews and the American government are also extremely dissatisfied and angry with the recent events in occupied Palestine, as well as the fascist approach of Netanyahu’s cabinet.
– The next challenge is related to the bleak relations between the Zionist regime and the American Jews in the new phase. The reason for this, as mentioned, is the dissatisfaction of the Jews of the United States with the extreme policies of Netanyahu’s cabinet, which greatly endangers the position and influence of the Zionist lobby in Congress and the White House.
Read more:
5 main threats to the national security of the Zionist regime
The important question raised here is; can the current decision-makers in the internal security institute of the Zionist regime, in the shadow of the chaotic atmosphere of this regime, determine the priorities and adopt the appropriate strategy in this field, or is such a task impossible?
The inability of Israeli decision makers to determine the strategy to deal with threats
The answer to this question requires an analysis of the situation and capabilities of the decision-makers of the internal security of the Zionist regime, either direct or official decision-makers or indirect and unofficial decision-makers, which we introduce as follows:
– The first decision-maker in the field of internal security of the Zionist regime is the cabinet of this regime. Since the new Israeli cabinet headed by Netanyahu is a cabinet made up of ultra Haredim and Netanyahu is not able to control their extreme behavior, this cabinet itself has become a problem for the Zionists in terms of security, and a high percentage of Israelis believe that Netanyahu’s cabinet is bringing Israel closer to collapse and internal conflict.
A few days ago, the head of Shabak, while warning Ben Guer about his extreme behavior, emphasized that the actions of Netanyahu’s cabinet minister will lead to the escalation and explosion of the situation in Jerusalem.
– The second group of decision-makers for Israel’s internal security is the military establishment and the army of this regime, but the role of the Israeli army in security decisions has largely been marginalized and diminished after the new cabinet took office. To the extent that during this period, the army has lost many of its powers in the case of Palestine, the West Bank, and Quds. The intervention of Netanyahu’s cabinet in the work of the army is so much that some believe that now the Israeli army actually has 2 chiefs of staff, one of them is Itmar Ben Gower, who is trying to expand his control over the military establishment and the army.
This issue has caused wide differences between army officials and cabinet members, and both accuse each other of inciting internal sedition. In addition, the polarization of the Zionist society as a result of intensifying political divisions has a direct negative effect on the army and marginalizes its role in security decisions.
After all, the numerous internal and external challenges of the United States, especially in the shadow of the continuation of the Ukraine crisis, do not leave much time for the United States to maneuver in regional cases.
The most dangerous point for the Zionists is that at the same time as their inability to formulate a suitable strategy, the internal and external threats to Israel continue to increase and the situation may reach a point where no strategy will work for this regime.